Live · updated 48 min ago State Data Center Market · AVOID ·
| Market | Verdict | ISO | Excess Power | Constraint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edison | AVOID | PJM | 21.9 | 44.3 |
| Clifton | AVOID | PJM | 21.8 | 44.7 |
| Bridgewater Township | AVOID | PJM | 21.7 | 44.9 |
| Piscataway Township | AVOID | PJM | 21.7 | 45.1 |
| Newark | AVOID | PJM | 21.6 | 45.3 |
| Weehawken | AVOID | PJM | 21.6 | 45.5 |
| Jersey City | AVOID | PJM | 21.4 | 46.1 |
| Somerset | AVOID | PJM | 21.4 | 46.3 |
| Piscataway | AVOID | PJM | 21.1 | 47.4 |
| Secaucus | AVOID | PJM | 21.0 | 47.5 |
Edison: Edison's data center market remains nascent and severely undercapitalized. The tracked market comprises eight facilities representing zero MW of operational capacity, indicating that meaningful infrastructure either does not exist or has not been deployed at scale. The operator base is fragmented across three entities—Iron Mountain, Iron Mountain Data Centers, and NJ 1 DATA CENTER—each managing single facilities, with no recent M&A activity recorded in the market. This structural thinness suggests Edison has not yet attracted the institutional capital flows… (continued for PRO subscribers)