Live · 1.1h fresh
Market Brief · CAUTIONDCPI score pending · Live as of 88% live coverage · 7/8 sections
| Operator | Facility | Power | Status | ETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yondr Group | Yondr Lancaster (Dallas Campus) | 550 MW | Planned | Not tracked |
| Anthropic / Fluidstack | Anthropic Texas AI Campus | 300 MW | Planned | Not tracked |
| Crow Holdings | Crow Holdings / CleanArc - Stemmons Corridor | 245 MW | Planned | Not tracked |
| PowerHouse Data Centers | PowerHouse Irving (Las Colinas) | 201 MW | Under Construction | Not tracked |
| CoreWeave | CoreWeave Helios TX (Core Scientific) | 200 MW | Under Construction | Not tracked |
| Edged | Edged Texas 1 | 80 MW | Under Construction | Not tracked |
| QTS | QTS DFW-3 | 48 MW | Under Construction | Not tracked |
| Arcadian Infracom | Arcadian Infracom Dallas PoP | Not tracked | Planned | Not tracked |
| Operator | Facilities | Total MW |
|---|---|---|
| QTS Realty | 2 | 0 MW |
| Meta | 2 | 0 MW |
| Edged | 1 | 80 MW |
| CITIGROUP TECHNOLOGY INC | 1 | 0 MW |
| Cyxtera | 1 | 0 MW |
| Date | Buyer | Seller | Value | MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | Stack | Not tracked | $540 | Not tracked |
| 2026-09-30 | Amazon | Not tracked | $430 | Not tracked |
| 2026-08-19 | QTS | Not tracked | Not tracked | 48 MW |
| 2026-06-05 | Compass | Not tracked | $15 | Not tracked |
Fort Worth's data center ecosystem remains nascent but structurally constrained. The market hosts 21 tracked facilities under five primary operators, with QTS Realty and Meta each operating two sites; a $10 billion campus development has secured revised site plan approval from city officials, signaling municipal appetite for large-scale expansion. Power availability, the sector's primary bottleneck, registers at 56/100 on the excess-power index—below the safety threshold for unconstrained growth. Only one of the 21 tracked facilities publicly reports its megawatt capacity, underscoring the opacity typical of early-stage regional markets.
The DCPI verdict of CAUTION reflects genuine infrastructure risk rather than speculative overcapacity. A constraint score of 51/100 positions Fort Worth at the inflection point where demand outpaces grid headroom; operators cannot assume unlimited power hookup availability without negotiating directly with municipal utilities and transmission planners. For institutional buyers and build-to-suit developers, this means feasibility studies must front-load power procurement timelines and secure committed capacity before land acquisition or design finalization. The market rewards operators with existing utility relationships or sites pre-sited on secondary transmission corridors. Speculative development carries elevated permitting and timeline risk.
Deal flow remains dormant in recorded M&A; no announced acquisitions or sales have closed in Fort Worth proper in the tracked period. The $10 billion campus announcement represents a greenfield development commitment rather than operator consolidation, suggesting capital is flowing toward new construction rather than portfolio aggregation. Meta's dual presence and QTS's two-site footprint indicate selective geographic positioning by tier-one operators, though neither has announced recent acquisitions in the submarket. Alpheus Communications, Centersquare, and smaller entrants occupy narrower niches, and the absence of recent deals hints at either patient capital deployment or capacity constraints limiting M&A velocity.
Fort Worth's regulatory environment—approvals for the major campus, ongoing city evaluation of statewide audit implications, and competing interest in liquid-cooled facilities—will determine whether the CAUTION verdict moderates or hardens through 2026.