{"generated_at":"2026-08-11T09:53:28.325911+00:00","key_stats":{"computed":"2026-08-11T06:29:10.113356+00:00","constraint":50,"dcpi_score":28.2,"excess":41,"facility_count":86,"name":"Miami","recent_deals":[{"buyer":"Hydra Host","date":null,"mw":null,"seller":null,"value":100.0}],"slug":"miami","state":"FL","top_operators":[{"count":4,"name":"Equinix"},{"count":3,"name":"Equinix, Inc."},{"count":3,"name":"CoreSite"},{"count":3,"name":"DataBank"},{"count":2,"name":"3HCLOUD LLC"}],"total_mw":248.0,"verdict":"AVOID"},"model":"claude-haiku-4-5","name":"Miami","narrative_md":"# Miami Data Center Market Analysis\n\nMiami operates as a fragmented mid-tier market with 86 tracked facilities delivering 248 MW of capacity, but faces acute infrastructure headwinds that limit expansion potential. The market's excess-power score of 41/100 indicates tight supply relative to demand, while the constraint score of 50/100 signals moderate-to-severe friction in land acquisition, permitting, and cooling infrastructure. Equinix commands the largest footprint with seven facilities across its corporate and subsidiary entities, followed by CoreSite and DataBank with three apiece, revealing a market where no single operator achieves dominant control yet competition remains localized.\n\nThe DCPI verdict of AVOID is unambiguous for acquisition-focused investors. A constraint score of 50/100 means that expansion\u2014whether greenfield or through incremental buildouts\u2014faces material headwinds in securing power interconnects, real estate zoning approvals, and adequate cooling resources. Buyers considering operational asset purchases will face limited exit optionality; any future purchaser will inherit the same constraint ceiling. The excess-power score of 41/100 suggests that additional capacity, while theoretically deployable, will struggle to find committed tenants at margin-accretive rates, compressing IRRs below market benchmarks.\n\nDeal flow remains sparse relative to market size. The Hydra Host exit for $100M (operator and valuation undisclosed) represents the only tracked M&A in the dataset, indicating either limited seller appetite or buyer hesitancy\u2014likely both. No major institutional buyers have announced platform acquisitions in Miami, contrasting sharply with the broader private-equity momentum seen in U.S. markets and the multi-billion-dollar Aligned Data Centers deployments across higher-constraint geographies. Operator fragmentation persists: the top five operators control approximately 15 of 86 facilities, leaving 71 sites distributed across smaller regional and independent players. This atomization suggests consolidation opportunity, yet the DCPI constraints explain why consolidators have not yet moved aggressively.\n\nForward momentum will remain subdued unless Miami's grid infrastructure and permitting apparatus materially improve, making this market a watch-list candidate rather than an immediate deployment target.","slug":"miami","word_count":309}