{"_gated":true,"as_of":"2026-03-31T01:12:11.346581","as_of_basis":"MAX(discovered_at) over the facilities this response counts - the newest observation in this cut, not a re-verification of every row in it.","by_status":{"Operational":7},"market":{"cities":["Itasca"],"id":"itasca","name":"Itasca"},"market_pricing":{"asking_rate":null,"asking_rate_range":null,"available":false,"basis":null,"reason":"DC Hub holds no lease-rate figure for this market yet. This is missing data, not a zero.","unit":"$/kW/mo","vacancy_percent":null},"recent_facilities":[{"city":"Itasca","discovered_at":"2026-03-31T01:12:11.346581","id":21237,"name":"NTT Chicago CH4","power_mw":null,"provider":"NTT","status":"Operational"},{"city":"Itasca","discovered_at":"2026-03-31T01:12:11.289090","id":21236,"name":"NTT Chicago CH3","power_mw":null,"provider":"NTT","status":"Operational"},{"city":"Itasca","discovered_at":"2026-03-31T01:11:43.099137","id":20820,"name":"NTT Chicago CH2","power_mw":null,"provider":"NTT","status":"Operational"},{"city":"Itasca","discovered_at":"2026-03-31T01:11:26.182342","id":20557,"name":"NTT Chicago CH1","power_mw":null,"provider":"NTT","status":"Operational"},{"city":"Itasca","discovered_at":"2026-03-31T01:05:36.855375","id":15970,"name":"RagingWire CH1 - NTT","power_mw":null,"provider":"RagingWire Data Centers - NTT","status":"Operational"}],"related_intel":[],"siting":{"available":true,"dcpi":{"as_of":"2026-10-02T18:28:50.519358+00:00","band":"did not clear a BUILD or CAUTION band (fallback; includes a market with a missing input)","data_basis":"mixed","definition":"Thresholds are the published DCPI method, not this market's scores. The scores are a paid field.","method_url":"https://dchub.cloud/dcpi/methodology","signal_tier":"full","verdict":"AVOID"},"iso":{"as_of":"2026-10-02T18:28:50.519358+00:00","class":"RTO","code":"PJM","operator":"PJM Interconnection"},"mw":{"as_of":"2026-03-31T01:12:11.346581","coverage":"NONE","coverage_pct":0.0,"note":"Sum over the rows that report capacity only; 0 of 7 rows report any. Read total_mw as a floor for the rows counted, not the market's capacity.","rows_reporting":0,"rows_total":7,"total_mw":null},"time_to_power":{"as_of":"2026-10-02T18:28:50.519358+00:00","band":"over_48_months","edges_months":[24,48],"not_a_date":"A modeled band over months, not an energize-by date. DC Hub does not publish a date a utility has not."},"utilities":{"as_of":null,"basis":"UNMEASURED - no market-to-serving-utility mapping is published for this market. iso.operator is the grid operator, not the retail utility.","names":null}},"stats":{"avg_power_mw":null,"capacity_basis":{"aggregation":"sum_rows","aggregation_means":"SUM(power_mw) over every qualifying row \u2014 the plain total. Adds a site twice when it is held as several keeper rows","compare_note":"MW totals from different surfaces are comparable only when all three axes match. A larger number is usually a wider population, not more capacity. See util/facility_count_basis.py.","fleet_filter":"duplicate records excluded","grouping":"city","grouping_means":"city alone \u2014 merges same-named cities in different states","note":"Read mw_reporting_count beside this total: it is the number of counted rows that reported any capacity at all. /markets/<slug> publishes sum_sites over the same market and reads higher.","population":"tracked","population_means":"every facility in the fleet, any lifecycle status, whether or not we hold a capacity figure for it \u2014 the widest honest answer"},"count_basis":{"compare_note":"Counts from different surfaces are comparable only when all three axes match. See util/facility_count_basis.py.","fleet_filter":"duplicate records excluded","grouping":"city","grouping_means":"city alone \u2014 merges same-named cities in different states","note":"This route. /markets/<slug> and its .json twin publish tracked / distinct_site / market_slug and read HIGHER on the same market \u2014 a wider grouping and a collapsed unit, not more facilities.","population":"tracked","population_means":"every facility in the fleet, any lifecycle status, whether or not we hold a capacity figure for it \u2014 the widest honest answer","unit":"row","unit_means":"one record in the facilities registry \u2014 over-counts a site held as several records"},"facility_count":7,"mw_reporting_count":0,"provider_count":4,"total_power_mw":0.0},"success":true,"top_providers":[{"facilities":4,"name":"NTT","power_mw":null},{"facilities":1,"name":"Microsoft","power_mw":null},{"facilities":1,"name":"RagingWire Data Centers","power_mw":null},{"facilities":1,"name":"RagingWire Data Centers - NTT","power_mw":null}]}