{"generated_at":"2026-09-02T09:33:59.497279+00:00","key_stats":{"computed":"2026-09-02T06:44:06.206699+00:00","constraint":41,"dcpi_score":32.4,"excess":48,"facility_count":4,"name":"Coeur d'Alene","recent_deals":[],"slug":"coeur-d'alene","state":"ID","top_operators":[{"count":1,"name":"Neutron LLC"},{"count":1,"name":"U S BANK COEUR D'ALENE DATA CENTER"},{"count":1,"name":"Ziply Fiber"}],"total_mw":0.0,"verdict":"AVOID"},"model":"claude-haiku-4-5","name":"Coeur d'Alene","narrative_md":"# Coeur d'Alene Data Center Market Analysis\n\nCoeur d'Alene presents a severely underdeveloped data center footprint with minimal operational infrastructure and acute power constraints. The tracked market comprises only 4 facilities totaling 0 MW of deployed capacity, indicating either early-stage development or stalled commercial deployment. The operator base is fragmented among three entities\u2014Neutron LLC, U.S. Bank Coeur d'Alene Data Center, and Ziply Fiber\u2014each operating a single facility, suggesting no consolidated platform exists and market concentration remains theoretically impossible given the current scale. The absence of recent M&A activity reinforces the perception that institutional capital has not yet identified material investment opportunity in this geography.\n\nThe DCPI verdict of AVOID is unambiguous for acquisition-focused investors. The excess-power score of 48/100 indicates insufficient headroom for demand absorption, while the constraint score of 41/100 signals severe operational limitations\u2014likely stemming from transmission capacity bottlenecks, grid interconnection delays, or utility infrastructure gaps endemic to Idaho's regional power ecosystem. Together, these metrics suggest that any new entrant acquiring existing facilities or attempting ground-up development would face meaningful risk of stranded capital or extended pre-revenue periods. The dual weakness means Coeur d'Alene lacks both the power surplus required for attractive unit economics and the operational flexibility to quickly remediate supply-side friction.\n\nDeal flow remains nonexistent, and operator fragmentation suggests no clear consolidation narrative. The three tracked operators show no evidence of strategic aggregation, cross-ownership, or platform-building activity. Regional context reveals that Idaho's data center ambitions have concentrated in Pocatello, where a $2.6B data center proposal triggered permit denial and subsequent appeal upheaval\u2014a cautionary tale for Coeur d'Alene investors regarding local regulatory risk and community resistance to large-scale development. While press reports reference exploratory interest in Coeur d'Alene, the absence of tracking activity and zero deployed MW underscore that speculative coverage has not yet translated into capitalized projects or operator expansion.\n\nForward-looking investors should monitor whether Idaho's regulatory environment clarifies and whether power infrastructure upgrades materialize, as both remain prerequisites for Coeur d'Alene to transition from AVOID to viable consideration.","slug":"coeur-d'alene","word_count":332}