{"generated_at":"2026-08-07T09:32:54.785718+00:00","key_stats":{"computed":"2026-08-07T09:15:32.926350+00:00","constraint":57,"dcpi_score":28.4,"excess":46,"facility_count":25,"name":"Chantilly","recent_deals":[],"slug":"chantilly","state":"VA","top_operators":[{"count":10,"name":"Amazon Web Services"},{"count":4,"name":"Unknown"},{"count":4,"name":"H5 Data Centers"},{"count":2,"name":""},{"count":2,"name":"AWS"}],"total_mw":366.0,"verdict":"AVOID"},"model":"claude-haiku-4-5","name":"Chantilly","narrative_md":"# Chantilly Data Center Market Analysis\n\nChantilly's data center footprint remains modest and AWS-dominated, with 25 tracked facilities totaling 366 MW across the metro area. AWS controls the largest operator share with 12 MW of capacity across multiple facility entries, while H5 Data Centers and an unnamed operator each hold 4 facilities. The market shows no recent M&A activity, indicating limited transaction velocity and investor appetite for this particular submarket.\n\nThe DCPI verdict of AVOID reflects a market caught between competing pressures: the excess-power score of 46/100 signals available generation capacity, but the constraint score of 57/100 reveals meaningful headwinds in land availability, interconnection capability, or cooling infrastructure. For acquisition-focused investors, this combination is particularly problematic\u2014adequate power without relief on physical or interconnection constraints means expansion costs remain high while available sites are limited. The gap between these two metrics suggests buyers would face either premium land pricing or lengthy permitting cycles to unlock that excess generation.\n\nOperator concentration around AWS indicates the market functions primarily as a service territory for a single hyperscaler rather than a competitive, multi-tenant battleground. The presence of H5 Data Centers and a large unidentified operator hints at smaller independent players occupying niche capacity, but the absence of tracked M&A suggests these operators are either not acquisition targets or lack the scale to attract institutional attention. The dormant deal flow contrasts sharply with Virginia's broader regional activity, where Amazon's recent $65 million leased facility acquisition and the Cloud Capital\u2013Realty Income joint venture commitment signal aggressive competition for premium Virginia sites. Chantilly appears to have been bypassed in favor of higher-constraint-relief locations.\n\nFor buyers evaluating Chantilly against peer Virginia markets, the risk profile tilts negative: while northern Virginia's constraint scores exceed 65/100, those markets justify their tightness with hyperscaler megadeals and deeper operator competition, whereas Chantilly combines constraint friction with limited deal flow and operator fragmentation. Forward momentum depends on whether future AWS expansion, fiber routing improvements, or third-party cooling solutions can push the constraint score below 50/100 and attract fresh M&A activity.","slug":"chantilly","word_count":337}